VCC vs Hong Kong OFC: Comparing Asia's Two Onshore Fund Vehicles
Two onshore answers to Cayman, side by side — segregation, tax exemption, treaty access, substance and adoption for 2026.
The Singapore Variable Capital Company (VCC) and the Hong Kong Open-ended Fund Company (OFC) are the two onshore, corporate, open-ended fund vehicles that Asia's leading financial centres built to compete with Cayman. Both let a single entity hold segregated sub-funds, issue and redeem shares at net asset value, and reach effective zero tax on qualifying fund income. The choice usually comes down to three things: which treaty network your portfolio needs, which tax-exemption regime fits your structure (Singapore's 13O/13U vs Hong Kong's unified fund exemption), and which market and investor base you serve.
VCC vs OFC at a glance
| Feature | Singapore VCC | Hong Kong OFC |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator | MAS + ACRA | Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) |
| Year live | VCC Act in force 14 Jan 2020 | OFC regime from 2018 |
| Sub-fund segregation | Yes — Section 29 ring-fencing | Yes — statutory protected sub-funds |
| Tax exemption route | 13O / 13U (MAS-administered) | Unified fund exemption (profits tax) |
| Treaty network | 90+ DTAs | ~45 comprehensive DTAs |
| Must appoint licensed manager | Yes — MAS-licensed Permissible Fund Manager | Yes — SFC-licensed investment manager |
| Adoption to date | Faster — 1,400+ entities by Q1 2025 | More gradual |
| Re-domiciliation in | Yes (inward transfer) | Yes (re-domiciliation mechanism) |
| Privacy | Register of members not public | Register access via SFC; not fully public |
Which has the better tax exemption?
Both can reach effective zero tax on qualifying fund income, but the routes differ. A Singapore VCC applies for Section 13O (from ~S$5M AUM, two investment professionals) or Section 13U (from S$50M, three professionals), administered by MAS — see the 13O/13U/13D guide. A Hong Kong OFC instead relies on the unified fund exemption, which exempts qualifying transactions without an upfront MAS-style application. The VCC route is more structured and audited; the OFC route is more self-assessed. Managers who want a clear, documented incentive award often prefer the Singapore approach for LP comfort.
How do the treaty networks compare?
This is usually the tiebreaker for Asia-focused funds. Singapore's 90+ DTAs meaningfully outweigh Hong Kong's narrower comprehensive network for many target markets — particularly India, Indonesia and Vietnam, where Singapore treaty rates can cut withholding tax sharply. Hong Kong's edge is its proximity and connectivity to mainland China (including Stock and Bond Connect) and a strong China DTA. If your portfolio is China-centric, the OFC story is competitive; if it is pan-Asian or India/ASEAN-weighted, the VCC's treaty footprint typically wins. The full withholding matrix is in the treaty/DTA access comparison.
Which is winning adoption?
The Singapore VCC has scaled faster, passing 1,400+ entities by Q1 2025, helped by aggressive promotion, the 13O/13U regime, a deep service-provider ecosystem and an easy re-domiciliation path. The OFC has grown more gradually. Neither is "losing" — but momentum, ecosystem depth and the family-office wave have favoured Singapore, which is also why most Cayman re-domiciliations we see point to the VCC.
Singapore or Hong Kong for your fund?
Share your strategy and target markets and we'll connect you with a vetted Singapore fund-setup partner to map the treaty and tax fit.
Speak to a specialist →Where the VCC pulls ahead for family offices
Singapore's combination of the VCC, the 13O/13U regime and its family-office ecosystem has made it the default for single and multi-family offices in the region. The OFC is primarily a fund-manager vehicle and is less commonly used as a family-office wrapper. If your end goal is a family-office or private-equity structure with treaty access, the VCC is usually the more complete answer.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a Singapore VCC and a Hong Kong OFC?
Both are onshore, corporate, open-ended fund vehicles with sub-fund segregation, created to compete with Cayman. The VCC sits under MAS/ACRA with access to Singapore's 90+ tax treaties and the 13O/13U exemptions; the OFC sits under Hong Kong's SFC with access to Hong Kong's smaller treaty network and its unified fund exemption.
Which is more popular, the VCC or the OFC?
The Singapore VCC has seen faster adoption, passing 1,400+ entities by Q1 2025, helped by re-domiciliation, the 13O/13U regime and a broad treaty network. The Hong Kong OFC adoption has been more gradual, though it benefits from proximity to mainland China and Stock/Bond Connect.
Does a Hong Kong OFC offer tax exemption?
Yes. A qualifying OFC can claim Hong Kong's unified fund exemption on qualifying transactions. A Singapore VCC uses the 13O or 13U exemption administered by MAS. Both can reach effective zero tax on qualifying fund income when conditions are met.
Can you re-domicile a fund to a VCC or an OFC?
Both jurisdictions allow inward re-domiciliation of foreign corporate funds. Singapore's VCC inward re-domiciliation and Hong Kong's OFC re-domiciliation mechanism both let an existing Cayman or BVI fund continue onshore without winding up.
VCC Singapore is an independent informational resource and is not a regulator, law firm or tax adviser. Tax thresholds, treaty rates and conditions are set by MAS/IRAS and foreign authorities and change periodically — confirm the current figures before acting. This page is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice.